<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume></Volume>
      <Issue>In Press</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Artificial Intelligence Governance and Organizational Performance: A Multi-Level Framework for Responsible Innovation</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Artificial Intelligence Governance and Organizational Performance: A Multi-Level Framework for Responsible Innovation</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>11</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to investigate the relationships between artificial intelligence governance, responsible innovation, and organizational performance, and to examine the mediating role of responsible innovation in linking governance mechanisms to performance outcomes. A cross-sectional, multi-level research design was employed, involving 320 participants from organizations located in Tehran, including senior executives, middle managers, and AI specialists. Data were collected using three validated instruments: the AI Governance Assessment Questionnaire, the Responsible Innovation Practices Inventory, and the Organizational Performance Scale. Descriptive statistics were computed, followed by reliability and confirmatory factor analyses to validate measurement constructs. Multilevel modeling and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of AI governance dimensions on organizational performance, with mediation and moderation effects assessed through bootstrapping techniques. The results indicated that all dimensions of AI governance—ethical oversight, data governance, algorithmic accountability, and regulatory compliance—were positively associated with responsible innovation and organizational performance. Responsible innovation was found to significantly mediate the relationship between governance mechanisms and performance outcomes. Algorithmic accountability emerged as the strongest predictor of performance among governance dimensions. Data governance, ethical oversight, and regulatory compliance also significantly contributed to organizational outcomes. The structural equation model demonstrated excellent fit, with AI governance positively influencing responsible innovation (β = .78, p &amp;lt; .001), responsible innovation positively affecting organizational performance (β = .56, p &amp;lt; .001), and a significant direct effect of AI governance on organizational performance (β = .29, p &amp;lt; .001). Collectively, the model explained over 60% of the variance in organizational performance, underscoring the importance of governance and responsible innovation in achieving sustainable organizational effectiveness. Effective AI governance enhances organizational performance both directly and indirectly through responsible innovation. Governance mechanisms that integrate ethical oversight, data management, accountability, and regulatory compliance facilitate responsible innovation, which in turn strengthens operational, strategic, and sustainability outcomes. Organizations should adopt comprehensive governance frameworks to realize the full potential of AI technologies while ensuring ethical, transparent, and socially responsible innovation.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Artificial intelligence governance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Responsible innovation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Organizational performance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Ethical oversight</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Algorithmic accountability</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Data governance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Regulatory compliance</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journaldtai.com/index.php/jdtai/article/download/273/254</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
