Model for Reducing High-Risk Behaviors Among Accountants: A Study Using Multiple Grounded Theory

Authors

    Mohammad Hosein Keshavarzi Department of Accounting, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
    Alireza Matoufi * Department of Accounting, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran alireza.matoufi@iau.ac.ir
    Hossein Aryaeinejad Department of Accounting, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
    Ali Khozein Department of Accounting, Ali.C., Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop a model for reducing high-risk behaviors among accountants using a multiple grounded theory approach. In this research, a multiple grounded theory method emerging from the data was employed. This type of research method is based on generating theory inductively through the qualitative analysis of qualitative data. In the present study, the collected data included various forms of information such as observations, interviews, review of the existing literature, participants’ memoirs, participation records, and the researcher’s own personal reflections. The statistical population of the study consisted of accountants who were members of the Iranian Association of Certified Accountants. Considering the qualitative nature of the study and the use of in-depth interviews, the participants were selected purposively. In this study, interviews were conducted with 14 accounting experts who were members of the Iranian Association of Certified Accountants using the snowball sampling method. The selected participants had at least 5 years of professional experience, a master’s degree or higher, and diverse experience in financial and accounting fields. The findings of the study were classified into five categories: causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences. The results indicate that reducing high-risk behaviors among accountants is a dynamic, interactive, and multilevel process in which causal, contextual, and intervening conditions lead to ethical and performance-related outcomes through organizational and professional strategies. The core category, as the theoretical nucleus, integrates all identified categories into a coherent framework and provides a comprehensive explanation of accountants’ professional behaviors within the real organizational context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriyie, S. O., Akomeah, M. O., Amoakohene, G., Ampimah, B. C., Ocloo, C. E., & Kyei, M. O. (2023). Forensic accounting: A novel paradigm and relevant knowledge in fraud detection and prevention. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(9), 615-624.

Agwa, A. M. F. (2018). Workplace deviance behaviors. Leadership, 25.

Bhattacharyya, R. (2024). Exploring ethical dilemmas and their impact on decision-making in managerial accounting. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5196774

Blay, A. D., Kadous, K., & Sawers, K. (2018). Anchoring and adjustment bias in financial statement analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(3), 759-794.

Coppins, T., & Weststar, J. (2023). What About My Occupation? A Multidimensional View of Workplace Identification and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. In Organizational Wrongdoing as the Foundational Grand Challenge (Vol. 84, pp. 153-170). Emerald Publishing Limited.

D'Silva, J. L., Bachok, A., & Zawawi, D. (2020). Factors affecting deviant behaviour at workplace among young public sector employees. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(15), 176-188.

Daraojimba, R. E., Farayola, O. A., Olatoye, F. M. O., Mhlongo, N., & Oke, T. T. L. (2023). Forensic accounting in the digital age: A US perspective scrutinizing methods and challenges in digital financial fraud prevention. Finance and Accounting Research Journal, 5(11), 342-360.

Endrikat, J., Hartmann, F., & Schreck, P. (2017). Social and ethical issues in management accounting and control: An editorial. Journal of Management Control, 28, 245-249.

Farasat, M., & Azam, A. (2022). Supervisor bottom-line mentality and subordinates' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Personnel Review, 51(1), 353-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2020-0129

Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2021). Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.

Howladar, M. H. R., Rahman, S., & Jewel, M. A. (2018). Deviant workplace behavior and job performance: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 11(1), 147-183.

Jebraeili Rezaei, R., & Davoodizadeh, S. (2022). Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Deviant, Impulsive and Self-Destructive Behavior Questionnaire and Emotional Motivations of Deviant Behavior. Psychological Research, 14(41), 107-121.

Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2018). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 573-588.

Lee, C. M. C., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Shall We Talk? The Role of Interactive Investor Platforms in Corporate Communication. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(3), 797-841.

Marks, S. R. (1974). Durkheim's theory of anomie. American Journal of Sociology, 80(2), 329-363.

Mashaikhi, B., & Taheri, Z. (2024). Developing a Model of Ethical Challenges in Accounting. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 13(50), 105-120.

Mashghouli Chafi, R., Samadi Largani, M., & Khalatbari Limaki, A. (2021). Integrated Ethical Decision-Making Model in the Society of Certified Accountants Using Grounded Theory. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 10(38), 223-239.

McKenna, F., Pevzner, M., Sheneman, A., & Zach, T. (2025). Audit quality in the face of a crisis: Evidence from the audit inspection scandal. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 101729.

Mirbagheri, S. H. R., Faghani, M., & Ahmadzadeh, H. (2025). Investigating the Relationships among Internal Control System Components to Reduce Financial Violations and Promote Administrative Health. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 14(55), 17-32.

Mirhosseini, M., Moeinoddin, M., Heyrani, F., & Hataminejad, S. H. (2022). Evaluation of Accountants' Safe Behavior through Designing a Professional Ethics Model. Occupational Health and Health Promotion, 6(2), 194-207.

Mohammadi Nafchi, A., & Alikhani, S. (2020). Ethics and Culture in Accounting. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 4(15), 49-64.

Mohammadi Zadeh, L., Makvandi, B., Pasha, R., Bakhtiarpour, S., & Hafezi, F. (2018). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Schema Therapy on Reducing Impulsive Behavior in Borderline Personality Disorder. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, 29(106), 44-53.

Nahtani, M., Hassanzehi, V., & Rigi, K. (2024). Investigating Ethics and Professional Behavior in Accounting. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 8(28), 399-413.

Nikbakht, M., Mehrgan, M. R., Safari, H., & Masoudi, J. (2019). The Effect of Ethical Behavior Development on Improving Professional Behavior of Accountants. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(29), 187-202.

Ozkul, F. U., & Pamukcu, A. (2012). Fraud detection and forensic accounting. In Emerging Fraud: Fraud Cases from Emerging Economies (pp. 19-41). Springer.

Pourdadashi, A., Matoufi, A., Abbasi, E., & Mansour, G. (2020). Presenting a Conceptual Model of Motivations and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors of Auditors Based on Grounded Theory. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7(2), 63-84.

Sari, R. N., & Januarti, I. (2024). Determinants of Dysfunctional Accountants Behavior: Internal and External Factors. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 10(1), 102-112.

Sheikhabdolkarim, F., Matoufi, A., Garkaz, M., & Khoazain, A. (2025). Identifying Factors Influencing Motivation of The Auditors' Bullying Behaviors Towards Each Other.

Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 709-716.

Sulaiman, R., Toulson, P., Brougham, D., Lempp, F., & Haar, J. (2021). The role of religiosity in ethical decision-making: A study on Islam and the Malaysian workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 297-313.

Wang, T., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & He, W. (2019). A social exchange perspective of employee-organization relationships and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of individual moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 473-489.

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D. A., & Francois, R. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1686.

Wijayanti, D. M., Senjani, Y. P., & Farah, W. (2024). The role of Machiavellian personality, altruistic personality, religiosity, whistleblowing system, and accounting firm size in mitigating fraud intention. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1), 119-134.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2025-12-14

Revised

2026-04-27

Accepted

2026-05-03

How to Cite

Keshavarzi, M. H., Matoufi, A., Aryaeinejad, H., & Khozein, A. (2026). Model for Reducing High-Risk Behaviors Among Accountants: A Study Using Multiple Grounded Theory. Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation, 4(4), 1-11. https://journaldtai.com/index.php/jdtai/article/view/260