Peer-Review Process
Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation (DTAI) follows a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the research published in the journal. The peer-review process is designed to maintain the highest academic standards while ensuring fairness and impartiality in evaluating submitted articles.
- Double-Blind Review: The identities of both the authors and reviewers are concealed from each other to eliminate bias during the review process.
- Reviewers: Each manuscript is reviewed by two or three independent experts in the field of digital transformation and administration and innvovation. These reviewers assess the article's originality, significance, methodology, findings, and overall contribution to the field.
- Decision Process: After the reviews are completed, the editorial team makes a decision to accept, reject, or request revisions. Authors may be asked to revise their manuscript based on the reviewers' feedback before final acceptance.
- Transparency and Fairness: All reviewers are required to follow ethical guidelines to ensure the fair and unbiased evaluation of each manuscript. The editorial team oversees the peer-review process to maintain consistency and fairness.
- Timeliness: We strive to ensure that the peer-review process is completed in a timely manner, typically within 4–6 weeks of submission. Authors are notified promptly of the review outcome.
The peer-review process is crucial for maintaining the high standards of Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation (DTAI) and ensuring that only the most innovative and impactful research is published.
