Identification and Ranking of Criteria and Sub-Criteria for Digital Asset Valuation Using Factor Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

Authors

    Shohreh Shaverdi Niasar Department of Management, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran
    Meysam Arabzadeh * Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran Meysam.Arabzadeh@iau.ac.ir
    Davood Kianoosh Department of Accounting and Public Administration, Nat.C., Islamic Azad University, Natanz, Iran
    Mohammadreza Mohagheghi Department of Accounting, Kas.C.، Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran
    Hossein jabbari Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran

Keywords:

Digital asset valuation, confirmatory factor analysis, Shannon entropy, WASPAS.

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify and rank the criteria and sub-criteria for digital asset valuation using factor analysis and multi-criteria decision-making techniques. In terms of purpose, this study is classified as applied research, while in terms of nature and methodology, it falls within the category of descriptive-correlational research. The statistical population consisted of capital market experts as well as investors in cryptocurrency markets. A total of 154 participants were selected through a non-probability purposive convenience sampling method. It should be noted that, for the confirmatory factor analysis section, the sample size was determined using G*Power software. Furthermore, for the multi-criteria decision-making section, 15 individuals were selected as the sample based on the theoretical foundations of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Smart PLS version 4 software was employed for confirmatory factor analysis, while Microsoft Excel was used for the multi-criteria decision-making section. Based on the review of the theoretical foundations, four criteria were identified, including identification of digital assets, recognition of digital assets, structural supervision of digital assets, and institutional supervision of digital assets. These criteria comprised twenty-five sub-criteria. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the constructs related to determining impairment losses of digital assets exceeding their recoverable amount relative to their carrying amount, internal supervision and controls concerning the accounting information system for the timely disclosure of digital assets, and the evaluation of digital asset recognition according to Paragraph 3 of Accounting Standard No. 8 concerning inventories and goods, exhibited weak factor loadings. Consequently, these three sub-criteria were removed from the model. The Shannon entropy method was employed to rank the main criteria, and the findings revealed that institutional supervision of digital assets was identified as the most important criterion. The WASPAS method was used to rank the sub-criteria, and the results demonstrated that the sub-criteria of estimating cryptocurrency volatility based on market value at the time of digital asset identification, evaluating the recognition of digital assets according to compliance with Accounting Standard No. 15 regarding investments, and internal supervision and controls based on assurance testing for the calculation of the fair value of digital assets ranked first through third, respectively. Based on the obtained findings, it is suggested that the greatest attention in digital asset valuation should be devoted to the criterion of institutional supervision of digital assets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, W. M. (2024). On the Robust Drivers of Cryptocurrency Liquidity: The Case of Bitcoin. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 69.

Almeida, J., & Goncalves, T. C. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Investor Behavior in the Cryptocurrency Markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100785

Alnasaa, M., Gueorguiev, N., Honda, J., Imamoglu, E., Mauro, P., Primus, K., & Rozhkov, D. (2022). Crypto-Assets, Corruption, and Capital Controls: Cross-Country Correlations. Economics Letters, 215, 110492.

Bajwa, I. A. (2025). Reinvestment Intentions in Cryptocurrency: Examining the Dynamics of Risks and Investor Risk Tolerance. Digital Business, 5(1), 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100104

Biju, A. V. N., & Thomas, A. S. (2023). Uncertainties and Ambivalence in the Crypto Market: An Urgent Need for a Regional Crypto Regulation. SN Business & Economics, 3(8), 136.

Carbo Valverde, S., Cuadros Solas, P. J., & Fernandez, F. R. (2025). Cryptocurrency Ownership and Cognitive Biases in Perceived Financial Literacy. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 45, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2024.101019

Conlon, T., Corbet, S., & Oxley, L. (2024). The Influence of European MiCA Regulation on Cryptocurrencies. Global Finance Journal, 101040.

Cornelli, G., Doerr, S., Frost, J., & Gambacorta, L. (2023). Crypto Shocks and Retail Losses.

Craney, T. A., & Surles, J. G. (2002). Model-Dependent Variance Inflation Factor Cutoff Values. Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391-403.

Deng, Q., & Zhou, Z. G. (2023). Liquidity Premium, Liquidity-Adjusted Return and Volatility, and Liquidity-Adjusted Mean Variance Framework: Illustrated with a Portfolio of Crypto Assets.

Elsayed, A. H., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. M. (2022). Risk Transmissions between Bitcoin and Traditional Financial Assets during the COVID-19 Era: The Role of Global Uncertainties. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102069.

Emmert, F. (2023). The Regulation of Cryptocurrencies in the United States of America. European Journal of Law Reform, 25, 1-2.

Fang, Y., Tang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Geopolitical Risk and Cryptocurrency Market Volatility. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1-17.

Galati, L. (2024). Exchange Market Share, Market Makers, and Murky Behavior: The Impact of No-Fee Trading on Cryptocurrency Market Quality. Journal of Banking & Finance, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107222

Gharibi, T., Rostami Mazoui, N., Moslemi, A., & Taherinia, M. (2025). Developing Criteria for the Valuation of Digital Assets and Evaluating the Identified Axes Based on Cross-Impact Matrices. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 22(87), 135-178.

Griffith, T., & Clancey Shang, D. (2023). Cryptocurrency Regulation and Market Quality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 84, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101744

Heiling, J. (2025). Digital Transformation and the Accounting for Intangible Assets in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2024-0177

Hubbard, B. (2023). Decrypting Crypto: Implications of Potential Financial Accounting Treatments of Cryptocurrency. Accounting Research Journal, 36(4-5), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-10-2022-0279

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S. (2022). A Review of Blockchain Technology Applications for Financial Services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(3), 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073

Jobst, A., Atzberger, D., Henker, R., Vollmer, J. O., Scheibel, W., & Döllner, J. (2023). Examining Liquidity of Exchanges and Assets and the Impact of External Events in Centralized Crypto Markets: A 2022 Study 2023 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC),

Karimi, P., Askarzadeh Darreh, G., Raeiti Shavazi, A., & Abtahi, S. Y. (2026). Presenting a Model for Pricing Digital Assets (Decentralized Assets) Based on a Behavioral Finance Approach. Accounting, Finance and Intelligence.

Lee, H., Lee, G.-C., & Koo, H.-Y. (2024). Exploring the Relationship between Rarity and Price of Profile Picture NFT: A Formal Concept Analysis on the BAYC NFT Collection. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100191

Li, M., Manahov, V., & Ashton, J. (2024). The Impact of Cryptocurrency Heists on Bitcoin’s Market Efficiency. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3049

Lin, Z., Chen, J., Wu, J., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., & Zheng, Z. (2024). CRPWarner: Warning the Risk of Contract-Related Rug Pull in DeFi Smart Contracts. Ieee Transactions on Software Engineering, 50(1), 1534-1154.

Lucey, B. M., Vigne, S. A., Yarovaya, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The Cryptocurrency Uncertainty Index. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102147.

Malekan, O. (2022). What Skeptics Get Wrong about Crypto’s Volatility. Harvard business review. https://hbr.org/2022/07/what-skeptics-get-wrong-about-cryptos-volatility

Moncada, R., Ferro, E., Fiaschetti, M., & Medda, F. (2024). Blockchain Tokens, Price Volatility, and Active User Base: An Empirical Analysis Based on Tokenomics. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(4), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12040107

Nadler, P., & Guo, Y. (2020). The Fair Value of a Token: How Do Markets Price Cryptocurrencies? Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101108

Saggu, A., Ante, L., & Kopiec, K. (2024). Uncertain Regulations, Definite Impacts: The Impact of the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulatory Interventions on Crypto Assets.

Sakariyahu, R., Lawal, R., Adigun, R., Paterson, A., & Johan, S. (2024). One Crash, Too Many: Global Uncertainty, Sentiment Factors and Cryptocurrency Market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102028

Sakariyahu, R., Paterson, A., Chatzivgeri, E., & Lawal, R. (2023). Chasing Noise in the Stock Market: An Inquiry into the Dynamics of Investor Sentiment and Asset Pricing. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1-35.

Schapsis, C., Micu, D., & Wingate, N. (2026). Digital Assets in Mental Accounting: How Cryptocurrency and NFTs Influence Charitable Choices. Computers in human Behavior, 174, 108820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108820

Scharfman, J. (2023). The Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Fraud Casebook. Springer.

Scharfman, J. (2024). Crypto Romance Scams and Pig Butchering. In The Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Fraud Casebook, Volume II: DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, Meme Coins, and Other Digital Asset Hacks (pp. 39-63).

Seikku, H., & Sifat, I. (2026). Bitcoin Bans & Regulatory Segmentation in Digitally Native Asset Markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 106, 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2026.102261

Teng, H. W., Härdle, W. K., Osterrieder, J., Baals, L. J., Papavassiliou, V. G., Bolesta, K., Kabasinskas, A., Filipovska, O., Thomaidis, N. S., Moukas, A. I., Goundar, S., Nasir, J. A., Weinberg, A. I., Arakelian, V., Akar, M., Kabaklarli, E., Apostol, E. S., Iannario, M., & Pele, D. T. (2023). Mitigating Digital Asset Risks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4594467

Tiwari, M., Zhou, Y., Ferrill, J., & Smith, M. (2025). Crypto Crashes: An Examination of the Binance and FTX Scandals and Associated Accounting Challenges. The British Accounting Review, 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101584

Uzougbo, N. S., Ikegwu, C. G., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024). Regulatory Frameworks for Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Challenges and Opportunities. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(2), 116-129.

Zhang, C., Sun, B., & Ling, X. (2024). Establishing a Digital-Driven Framework for Evaluating Digital Assets 10th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA), Chiang Mai, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDIA63733.2024.10808968 https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDIA63733.2024.10808968

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2026-01-13

Revised

2026-05-18

Accepted

2026-05-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shaverdi Niasar , S. ., Arabzadeh, M., Kianoosh, D., Mohagheghi , M. ., & jabbari, H. . (2026). Identification and Ranking of Criteria and Sub-Criteria for Digital Asset Valuation Using Factor Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation, 1-17. https://journaldtai.com/index.php/jdtai/article/view/263

Similar Articles

1-10 of 154

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.